#define MAX_DIR_HARD_LINK_WARNINGS 8
-static bool
-ads_entries_have_same_name(const struct wim_ads_entry *entry_1,
- const struct wim_ads_entry *entry_2)
-{
- return entry_1->stream_name_nbytes == entry_2->stream_name_nbytes &&
- !memcmp(entry_1->stream_name, entry_2->stream_name,
- entry_1->stream_name_nbytes);
-}
-
static bool
inodes_consistent(const struct wim_inode *inode_1,
const struct wim_inode *inode_2)
{
- if (inode_1->i_num_ads != inode_2->i_num_ads)
- return false;
-
- for (u32 i = 0; i <= inode_1->i_num_ads; i++) {
- const u8 *hash_1 = inode_stream_hash_unresolved(inode_1, i);
- const u8 *hash_2 = inode_stream_hash_unresolved(inode_2, i);
-
- if (!hashes_equal(hash_1, hash_2) && !is_zero_hash(hash_1))
- return false;
-
- if (i && !ads_entries_have_same_name(&inode_1->i_ads_entries[i - 1],
- &inode_2->i_ads_entries[i - 1]))
- return false;
- }
-
- if (inode_1->i_attributes != inode_2->i_attributes)
- return false;
-
- if (inode_1->i_security_id != inode_2->i_security_id)
- return false;
-
- return true;
+ /* This certainly isn't the only thing we need to check to make sure the
+ * inodes are consistent. However, this seems to be the only thing that
+ * the MS implementation checks when working around its own bug.
+ *
+ * (Tested: If two dentries share the same hard link group ID, Windows
+ * 8.1 DISM will link them if they have the same unnamed stream hash,
+ * even if the dentries provide different timestamps, attributes,
+ * alternate data streams, and security IDs! And the one that gets used
+ * will change if you merely swap the filenames. But if you use
+ * different unnamed stream hashes with everything else the same, it
+ * doesn't link the dentries.)
+ *
+ * For non-buggy WIMs this function will always return true. */
+ return hashes_equal(inode_unnamed_stream_hash(inode_1),
+ inode_unnamed_stream_hash(inode_2));
}
static int
params->num_inconsistent_inodes++;
continue;
}
- if (unlikely(d_inode->i_attributes & FILE_ATTRIBUTE_DIRECTORY)) {
+ if (unlikely((d_inode->i_attributes & FILE_ATTRIBUTE_DIRECTORY) ||
+ (inode->i_attributes & FILE_ATTRIBUTE_DIRECTORY)))
+ {
params->num_dir_hard_links++;
if (params->num_dir_hard_links <=
MAX_DIR_HARD_LINK_WARNINGS)
* - Due to bugs in the Microsoft implementation, dentries with different
* 'hard_link_group_id' fields may, in fact, need to be interpreted as
* naming different inodes. This seems to mostly affect images in
- * install.wim for Windows 7. I still have not been able to determine
- * precisely how Microsoft's implementation generates and handles this
- * invalid case, but we can at least try doing something reasonable by
- * only joining a dentry with a different inode when this would not
- * change the file's meaning (e.g. its contents or attributes).
+ * install.wim for Windows 7. I try to work around this in the same way
+ * the Microsoft implementation works around this.
*
* Returns 0 or WIMLIB_ERR_NOMEM. On success, the resulting inodes will be
* appended to the @inode_list, and they will have consistent numbers in their