Search found 474 matches
- Tue Aug 18, 2015 11:37 pm
- Forum: wimlib discussion
- Topic: [SOLVED] Issue w wimlib 1.8.1 and later (deploying Win7)
- Replies: 23
- Views: 44653
Re: Issue w wimlib 1.8.1 and later (deploying Win7)
wimlib v1.8.2-BETA4, which I just posted, includes a workaround for duplicate NTFS streams.
- Tue Aug 18, 2015 11:34 pm
- Forum: wimlib discussion
- Topic: wofadk.sys Support?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 22656
Re: wofadk.sys Support?
Hi,
wimlib v1.8.2-BETA4, which I just posted, will acquire SeManageVolumePrivilege.
Try it and see if you still get this error or not.
- synchronicity
wimlib v1.8.2-BETA4, which I just posted, will acquire SeManageVolumePrivilege.
Try it and see if you still get this error or not.
- synchronicity
- Tue Aug 18, 2015 8:41 pm
- Forum: wimlib discussion
- Topic: wofadk.sys Support?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 22656
Re: wofadk.sys Support?
@JFX Yes, I was wondering whether the "privilege not held" error code is real or just a red herring. Unfortunately, I've had reports of the FSCTL_SET_EXTERNAL_BACKING ioctl failing with a completely irrelevant error code before, so I have to be a little careful. wimlib acquires all the pri...
- Tue Aug 18, 2015 12:35 pm
- Forum: wimlib discussion
- Topic: [SOLVED] Issue w wimlib 1.8.1 and later (deploying Win7)
- Replies: 23
- Views: 44653
Re: Issue w wimlib 1.8.1 and later (deploying Win7)
Hi, One of the NTFS-3g developers confirmed that it's invalid for a file to have multiple unnamed data streams. They asked about the history of the file (perhaps any named streams being added or deleted), and also whether running 'chkdisk' removes one of the unnamed streams. Just to confirm, this fi...
- Tue Aug 18, 2015 12:30 pm
- Forum: wimlib discussion
- Topic: wofadk.sys Support?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 22656
Re: wofadk.sys Support?
Hi, I have no idea why this doesn't work. I've had a similar problem reported once before, and it was stated that it occurred even when wimlib-imagex was run as an Administrator. I don't currently have an easy way to reproduce this --- maybe you could link to the boot.wim for a Windows PE that relia...
- Tue Aug 18, 2015 1:07 am
- Forum: wimlib discussion
- Topic: [SOLVED] Issue w wimlib 1.8.1 and later (deploying Win7)
- Replies: 23
- Views: 44653
Re: Issue w wimlib 1.8.1 and later (deploying Win7)
Thanks. It looks like that confirms what I suspected: the data streams were missing because libntfs-3g reported two unnamed data streams, which is unexpected; and the different versions of wimlib happened to handle this differently. I'm actually planning to work around this in a slightly different w...
- Mon Aug 17, 2015 12:37 pm
- Forum: wimlib discussion
- Topic: WinPE customisation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 10761
Re: WinPE customisation
No, wimlib does not provide equivalents of the /Add-Driver and /Add-Package commands.
- Thu Aug 13, 2015 3:55 am
- Forum: wimlib discussion
- Topic: Cloning the Git repository
- Replies: 1
- Views: 8622
Re: Cloning the Git repository
Just do:
This is separate from the gitlist installation I set up (the latter is just a repository viewer).
Code: Select all
git clone git://wimlib.net/wimlib
- Wed Aug 12, 2015 12:11 am
- Forum: wimlib discussion
- Topic: [SOLVED] Issue w wimlib 1.8.1 and later (deploying Win7)
- Replies: 23
- Views: 44653
Re: Issue w wimlib 1.8.1 and later (deploying Win7)
Hi, First, I'm still confused about whether we are dealing with one problem or two (one with capture, one with apply). The metadata you most recently posted only shows the difference after a *capture* directly from a sysprepped filesystem, so an *apply* isn't in the picture at all, correct? Second, ...
- Sat Aug 08, 2015 4:37 am
- Forum: wimlib discussion
- Topic: [SOLVED] Issue w wimlib 1.8.1 and later (deploying Win7)
- Replies: 23
- Views: 44653
Re: Issue w wimlib 1.8.1 and later (deploying Win7)
Hi, The metadata shows that the WIM image captured with wimlib v1.8.0 contains data streams for the files that you noticed in the diff of the NTFS-3g mounted filesystems, whereas the WIM image captured with wimlib v1.8.2-BETA2 does not. This is very interesting, but the metadata also shows that this...